I noticed the below information posted on the ADCA Update list. For those of you who don’t know, the ADCA update list is primarily an announcement list for ATOD professionals. Putting aside the quality of the below information aside – why would Drug Free Australia believe that providing unreferenced text to professionals would give any sense of credibility to their cause?
There ARE references cited in the text but these are obviously not viewable in the email nor could I find them on the web. Unbelievable.
The email in question:
“Marijuana Use ˆ
By Fred J. Payne, M.D., M.P.H.
Marijuana, or cannabis, is a crude preparation of flowering tops, leaves, seeds, and stems of female plants of the Indian hemp Cannabis sativa; and it is usually smoked as a “recreational” drug. The intoxicating constituents of hemp are found in the resin exuded by the tops of the plants, particularly the females. Male plants produce only a small amount of resin. The resin itself, when prepared for smoking or eating, is known as “hashish.”
Various cannabis preparations are used as intoxicants throughout the world, with potency varying with the amount of resin present. The tops contain the most resin; stems, seeds, and lower leaves the least. The intoxicants in the resin are called cannabinoids, the most active of which is delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).Although marijuana use in the United States dates back to the 19th century, its early use was confined predominantly to certain groups such as Mexican laborers, inner city Blacks, and some “Bohemian” groups.
Restricted by increasingly severe legal penalties imposed during the 1930s, its use in those relatively small groups was not a major cause for public concern. Following the widespread popularity and use of the hallucinogen LSD during the 1960s, an explosion in marijuana use took place, at first on college campuses, followed by downward spread to secondary schools and upward to portions of the middle class. Public alarm grew over the hazards to the general public posed by the rapidly growing use of marijuana and other mind-altering drugs. Marijuana, plus other drugs like heroin, had a high potential for abuse with limited or no potential for medical use, and they were designated as schedule I drugs ˆ making their use and possession illegal.
The scheduling of dangerous drugs is done by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), but only after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decides that a new drug is a suitable medication, albeit one needing to be scheduled because of its abuse potential. The agencies work closely together, as required by law, and a routine scheduling action cannot be taken by one of the agencies without the concurrence of the other.Recent developmentsDuring the past two decades in the United States, there has been a steady increase in the number of people entering treatment for marijuana related problems.
According to one report, two-thirds of those admitted for treatment were young ˆ between the ages of 12 and 25 years (1). The majority of those admissions were from either the justice or educational systems.Marijuana use is associated with impaired educational attainment (2), reduced workplace productivity (3), and plays a major role in motor vehicle accidents (4). Marijuana is increasingly recognized as a cause, along with tobacco, of both lung cancer and emphysema (5) (6). In spite of this, an editorial in a major medical journal, the Lancet, stated as recently as 1995 that “the smoking of cannabis, even long term, is not harmful to health.”(7).In the United States, marijuana use remained stable at about 4% during the decade between 1991-1992 and 2001-2002, according to two large national surveys conducted 10 years apart (8). Marijuana use disorders among adults, however, increased significantly during that decade. The potency of THC in confiscated marijuana increased by 66% between 1992 and 2002, and this may have contributed to the problem.
The disorders included marijuana abuse, that is, use under hazardous conditions or impairment in social, occupational, or educational functioning related to use. Another marijuana use disorder is dependence, defined as increased tolerance, compulsive use, impaired control, and continued use despite physical and psychological problems caused by its use.A major focus for concern has been the extent to which marijuana use leads to the use of and dependence on “hard” drugs. There has been a longstanding debate over whether this association is due to the criminalization of marijuana use, forcing the user to seek suppliers who deal in other illicit drugs, or whether marijuana conditions the user to try other drugs.A study was reported from Australia of a volunteer sample of 311 young, adult, monozygotic and dizygotic, same sex twins discordant for early cannabis use i.e. less than 17 years (1). The outcome measures included subsequent non-medical use of prescription sedatives, hallucinogens, cocaine or other stimulants, and opioids leading to abuse or dependence on these drugs. Abuse and/or dependence on cannabis or alcohol were also outcome measures.
Twins who used cannabis by age 17 had odds of other drug use or alcohol dependence plus drug abuse from two to five times higher than those of their discordant twin. These associations did not differ between monozygotic and dizygotic twins. The findings indicate that early use of cannabis is associated with increased risks of progression to other illicit drug use. Since the subjects were twins neither genetic nor environmental factors were likely to have produced the results. However, since marijuana use is illegal in Australia the study was unable to establish whether having to obtain the drug from dealers involved with other illegal drugs exposes the marijuana user to other illicit drugs.A similar study was conducted in the Netherlands, where out of a group of 6000 twins, 219 same sex pairs were chosen, one of whom had begun using marijuana before age 18 while the other twin had not (9). The study showed that the twin who used marijuana before the age of 18 had a significantly greater risk of using hard drugs and of drug dependence.
Since marijuana is legal and widely available in the Netherlands, the findings from both studies clearly indicate that marijuana serves as a gateway for use and abuse of other addictive drugs in adolescents whose central nervous system is still not fully developed.”
The DFA are just trying to remain relevant in this post Howard era. They are without doubt, the biggest propaganda machine in this country. They have no facts, no evidence and often quote other nutters who cherry pick reports that have been slammed by the medical industry.
They are so dangerous to our society and in a perfect world would be hauled in front of a court and charged with the deaths of thousands of addicts. The utter scum of this world.
If you want to know more about the devious DFA, visit DFA Watch at http://dfaw.typepad.com/dfawatch/
Why can people grow it in South Australia and Canberra and not in other states.
I know it’s bad for you. But they are hurting themselves whereas if they drink booze they are much more likely to hurt someone else.
i feel much safer walking through a pub where everyone is stoned rather than a pub where everyone is pissed. Asked any policeman and see who they believe are more violent.
The local drug dealer usually sells lots of drug types…so they know where to buy the shabu, e’s etc etc.
Let the hippies grow a few plants at home and forget about it.. take the criminal element out of it…
You could have saved yourself 30 minutes of hard writing effort by just going to the DFA website and downloading the full document. It is fully referenced to a biliography of almost 400 journal studies and reviews.
Drug Free Australia
None of those “almost 400 journal studies and reviews” mentioned the tends of thousands of journal articles which show cannabinoids to be harmless by comparison to any of the current prescription medications available (far less harmful than Panadol which can easily kill) and that it is helpful in the *treatment* of so very many horrible and painful health problems. This includes the symptoms of schizophrenia, which it HELPS, and does not cause – no matter what those 2 nurses who work in a psych ward seem to think – a “statement of opinion” letter, that you folk in the anti-drug world all seem to believe was a scientific study – it wasn’t one. It was the opinions of two people who work in a psych ward, and whose entire ‘sample set’ were people with schizophrenia (by the way, less of that institutionalised group used cannabis than in the general population).
There are no significant anti-cannabis medical journal articles that have not been utterly panned as either “bad science” or outright propaganda by serious medical professionals and scientists.
As for me, to me cannabis is the difference between eating and starving – between walking and crawling – between being in terrible pain and being unable to (literally) live through it. I have been on dozens of antinauseants, pain medications and other medications and not one of them does the job as well (and with fewer side effects). Why should I be risking police involvement, in order to have the “quality medical care” which is guaranteed to me in the constitution of this country?
Can’t access this website:
http://dfaw.typepad.com/dfawatch/ Any idea how to find the dfawatch site?
guys i found this blog its about this guy from England I think who is a small time dealer, its really quite funny streetdealerblog